SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 6

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, B.R.SARANGI, JJ
UTKAL SUPPLIERS, GANJAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


Per: Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J.

The petitioner, as a proprietorship firm, has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:

“(i) Appropriate direction shall not be given to the opposite parties more especially opposite party no.2 to award the contract in favour of the petitioner in view of the financial evaluation dated 17.07.2020 under Annexure-3 to secure ends of justice;

(ii) the action of the Opposite Parties more especially opposite party No.2 shall not be declared as illegal, arbitrary, malafide, unconstitutional and contrary to the Govt. guidelines and Tender Conditions.

If the Opposite Parties fail to show cause or show insufficient cause, to make the rule absolute;

And to pass such other order/orders, direction/directions as would deem complete relief to the petitioner;”

2. The Chief District Medical & Public Health Officer-cum- District Mission Director, NHM, Sambalpur, Rogi Kalyan Samiti, DHH, Sambalpur issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) vide RFP Reference No. 459/03/Diet/2020 dated.06.06.2020 at Annexure-1 inviting tenders for supply of diet (dry & cooked) to DHH, Sambalpur. The bid was of two parts, namely, technical bid and financial bid so as to carry on the purpose of req

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top