SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 5

SINGRAI BASKEY – Appellant
Versus
FAGU HEMBRAM – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S N C PATI', '', 'A K NANDA', 'S K SWAIN', 'M/S B H MOHANTY', '', 'R M MOHANTY', 'B DAS', 'R K NAYAK']

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK

S.A. No.94 of 1989

From the judgment and decree dated 13.12.1988 and 7.1.1989

respectively passed by Sri N. Sengupta, learned District Judge,

Mayurbhanj, Baripada in T.A. No.31 of 1986 reversing the judgment

and decree dated 30.8.1986 and 6.9.1986 respectively passed by

Sri R.N. Bhuyan, learned Sub-Judge, Rairangpur in T.S. No.46 of

1982-I.

----------

Singrai Baskey and others

&&..&&&

Appellants

---versus4

Fagu Hembram and others

&&&&&&

Respondents

For Appellants

: Mr. Budhiram Das, Advocate

For Respondents : Mr. D.P. Mohanty, Advocate

J U D G M E N T

P R E S E N T:

THE HON9BLE DR. JUSTICE A.K. RATH

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date of Hearing :29.08.2019 ' Date of Judgment:29.08.2019

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dr. A.K. Rath, J.

Plaintiffs are appellants against the reversing judgment

in a suit for declaration of title, confirmation of possession and in the

alternative for recovery of possession, if they are dispossessed during

pendency of the suit.

02.

Plaintiffs in the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top