ORISSA HIGH COURT
CHANDRAMANI SAMAL – Appellant
Versus
SUKANTI SAMAL – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK (In the matter of an appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908)
Chandramani Samal and another …. Appellants -versus-
Sukanti Samal & Others …. Respondents For Appellants - Mr.P.C.Mishra,Advocate For Respondents - Mr.Prabin Dash, Advocate On behalf of Mr.S.K.Dash, Advocate CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA Date of Hearing :04.02.2026:: Date of Judgment :19.02.2026 A.C. Behera, J. This Second Appeal has been preferred against the confirming judgment.
2. The Appellants in this Second Appeal being the husband and wife respectively were the Defendant Nos.1 and 2 before the learned Trial Court in the suit vide C.S. No.20 of 2019 and Appellants before the learned 1st Appellate Court in the first appeal The Respondent No.1 in this 2nd Appeal was the sole Plaintiff before the learned Trial Court in the suit vide C.S. No.20 of 2019 and Respondent No.1 before the learned 1st Appellate Court in the 1st appeal vide R.F.A. No.16 of 2023.
The Respondent Nos.2 to 5 in this 2nd Appeal were the Defendant Nos.3 to 6 before the learned Trial Court in the suit vide C.S. No.20 of 2019 and Respondent Nos.2 to 5 before the learned
1st Appellate Court in the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.