SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 815

ORISSA HIGH COURT
NIRMALA CHANDRA PANIGRAHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.5180 of 2026 Nirmala Chandra Panigrahi & ..... Petitioners Ors.

Represented by Adv. -

Sanjib Mohanty -versus-

State Of Orissa & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Represented by Adv. –

D.K. Sahoo, A.G.A.

CORAM:

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA

ORDER

18.02.2026 Order No.

01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners as well as learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State-Opposite Parties. Perused the writ application as well as the documents annexed thereto.

3. The Petitioners have filed the present writ application with the following prayer:

“Under such circumstances, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to admit the case and issue notice to the Opposite Parties to file their show cause as to why the case of the Petitioner shall not be allowed and after hearing the parties, the case of the Petitioner be allowed.

consideration of the case of the petition for their re- engagement/ appointment in the post of Computer Teachers taking into his past experience and qualification.

And/ or further direction be given to the opp. Party No.1 fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top