SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 817

ORISSA HIGH COURT
BANCHHANIDHI SATAPATHY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.5229 of 2026 Banchhanidhi Satapathy …. Petitioner Mr. S.K. Dwivedy, Advocate -versus-

State of Odisha & Anr. …. Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC CORAM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

Order No. 18.02.2026

01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties.

3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia challenging order dtd.20.12.2024 so passed by Opposite Party No.2 under Annexure-1. Vide the said order, Opposite Party No.2 withheld the pension and gratuity of the Petitioner in full and permanently.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner contended that such an order under Annexure-1 was passed, because of the order of conviction and sentence passed against the Petitioner by the learned Special Judge, (Vigilance), Keonjhar in VGR No.3 of 2017/T.R. No.8 of

2017, vide judgment dtd.23.03.2024 under Annexure-2.

4.1. It is further contended that, challenging such order of conviction and sentence, Petitioner has already approached this Court by filing Criminal Appeal No.274 of 2024. This Court vide order dtd.02.04.2024 under Annexure-3 wh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top