SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 1453

ORISSA HIGH COURT
LIZARANI SAMANTARAY – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR GANJAM – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.18646 of 2017 (An application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950) Lizarani Samantaray …. Petitioner -versus-

Collector, Ganjam and Others …. Opposite Parties Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode):

For Petitioner - Mr. Rabindra Kumar Patnaik, Advocate.

For Opposite Parties - Mr. G. Mohanty, Standing Counsel.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA Date of Hearing :16.01.2026 :: Date of Judgment :22.01.2026 A.C. Behera, J. This writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for directing the Collector, Ganjam (O.P. No.1) to conduct an enquiry into the grievances of the petitioner as per Annexure-5 and to pass an appropriate order after giving personal hearing to the petitioner and others regarding the selection of “Jogana Sahayak” of Genja G.P.

2. I have already heard from the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned SC for the State.

3. As per the case of the petitioner, according to the Advertisement made by the O.P. No.3 (Block Development Officer, Surada Block in the district of Ganjam), the petitioner along w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top