SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 1945

ORISSA HIGH COURT
M/S.RUTUPARNA CONSTRUCTION BBSR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.32445 of 2025 M/s. Rutuparna Construction, …. Petitioner Bhubaneswar Represented by Adv.–

Mr. Achyutananda Pattanaik, Advocate -Versus-

State of Odisha and Others …. Opposite Parties Represented by Adv.–

Ms. A. Dash, Addl. Standing Counsel CORAM:

HON’ BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

ORDER

Order No. 21.01.2026

01. 1. The instant writ petition is filed seeking a direction upon the opposite parties to release the amount shown in the escalation bill submitted to the authorities. It is averred in the instant wit petition that a tender was floated for execution of Rural Piped Water Supply work under the execution of a Rural Piped Water Supply Scheme to village Badhimuhan wherein the petitioner was adjudged as the successful bidder. The agreement was executed and the petitioner undertook the work in terms of the said tender and it is not in dispute that the final bill raised by the petitioner was duly paid by the authorities. Subsequent thereto, the petitioner submitted the escalation bill annexed to the writ petition and sensing that the same is kept pending by the authority, a representation was made to take a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top