SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 2304

ORISSA HIGH COURT
PANCHAMI @ PANCHALI NAYAK – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR KANDHAMAL – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No.132 of 2026 Panchami @ Panchali Nayak ..... Petitioners and others Represented by Adv. -

Kalpataru Khuntia -versus-

Collector, Kandhamal and others ..... Opposite Parties Mr. A. Mohanty, ASC CORAM:

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA

ORDER

28.01.2026 Order No.

01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners. Perused the CMP application as well as the prayer made therein.

3. By filing the present application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioners seek to challenge order dated 06.12.2022, 13.07.223 & final order dated 20.12.2023 passed by the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Balliguda in Execution Proceeding No.06 of 2017.

4. Learned counsel for the Petitioners at this juncture contended that by virtue of the impugned order the right of the Petitioners to file an objection in the execution case under Section 47 of the CPC has been taken away by the learned trial court on the ground of limitation. In the aforesaid context, learned counsel for the Petitioners submitted that the limitation as prescribed in Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963 would be applicable

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top