SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 2813

ORISSA HIGH COURT
BHAGYDHAR PRUSTY – Appellant
Versus
UTKAL UNIVERSITY VANI VIHAR BBSR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.37800 of 2025 Bhagydhar Prusty ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. –

Mr. Sanjib Mohanty -versus-

Utkal University, ..... Opposite Parties Vani Vihar, Bhubaneswar and others.

Represented by Adv. –

Mr. Tarananda Pattanayak, Advocate for O.P. No.1 & 2.

Mr. C.M. Singh, ASC for O.P. Nos.3 & 4 CORAM:

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA

ORD ER

17.04.2026 Order No.

03. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2. Heard Shri Sanjib Mohanty, learned counsel for the Petitioner, Shri Tarananda Pattanayak, learned counsel appearing for the Utkal University-Opposite Parties No.1 & 2, and Smt. Sasmita Nayak, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State-Opposite Parties No.3 and 4.

3. The Petitioner has filed the present writ application with the following prayer:-

“It is therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court be graciously pleased to:

i) Admit the writ application.

ii) Call for the record.

iii) And after hearing the parties the case of the petitioner be allowed and pass necessary order to set aside Annexure-11 dtd:11.12.2025 and further direction be given to the opp. parties to sanction pension an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top