ORISSA HIGH COURT
BHAGYDHAR PRUSTY – Appellant
Versus
UTKAL UNIVERSITY VANI VIHAR BBSR – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.37800 of 2025 Bhagydhar Prusty ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. –
Mr. Sanjib Mohanty -versus-
Utkal University, ..... Opposite Parties Vani Vihar, Bhubaneswar and others.
Represented by Adv. –
Mr. Tarananda Pattanayak, Advocate for O.P. No.1 & 2.
Mr. C.M. Singh, ASC for O.P. Nos.3 & 4 CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
ORD ER
17.04.2026 Order No.
03. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).
2. Heard Shri Sanjib Mohanty, learned counsel for the Petitioner, Shri Tarananda Pattanayak, learned counsel appearing for the Utkal University-Opposite Parties No.1 & 2, and Smt. Sasmita Nayak, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State-Opposite Parties No.3 and 4.
3. The Petitioner has filed the present writ application with the following prayer:-
“It is therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court be graciously pleased to:
i) Admit the writ application.
ii) Call for the record.
iii) And after hearing the parties the case of the petitioner be allowed and pass necessary order to set aside Annexure-11 dtd:11.12.2025 and further direction be given to the opp. parties to sanction pension an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.