SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 2862

ORISSA HIGH COURT
BALAKRISHNA PANDA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.10114 of 2026 Balakrishna Panda ..... Petitioner Represented by Mr.P.K.Nanda, Adv -versus-

State of Odisha and others ..... Opposite Parties Represented by A.G.A.

CORAM:

JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA

ORDER

Order No. 10.4.2026.

06. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Addl.

Government Advocate for the State.

3. The Petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayer;

“It is, therefore, humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court

may graciously be pleased to issue Rule Nisi calling upon

the 0pp. Parties to show cause as to why a writ in the

nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ(s) shall

not be issued to direct the Opposite Parties to correct the

area from Ac. 0.044 to 0.074 decimals in Khata No. 341, Plot No. 267/3407 in Mouza- Bhubaneswar Sahar Unit No.16, Jaydev Vihar under Bhubaneswar Tahasil within stipulated period as per the ROR published by the Settlement Authority and further be pleased to direct the Government authorities to pay compensation for the latches and on perusal of the causes so shown or insufficient causes shown to make the said rule absolute may pas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top