SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 3160

ORISSA HIGH COURT
BHAIRABI BEHERA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
WP(C) 9509 / 2026



IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.9509 OF 2026 ….

Bhairabi Behera Petitioner Mr. Subash Chandra Puspalaka, Advocate -versus-

….

State of Odisha and others Opp. Parties Mr. Bibekananda Nayak, Additional Government Advocate CORAM:

JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA

ORDER

Order No. 07.04.2026

01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. The Petitioner, in this writ petition, prays for protection from eviction from the place where he is running his business and earning his livelihood.

3. Mr. Puspalaka, learned counsel submits that the Petitioner is a Street Vendor and has been recognized as such by the Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation (BMC). The Petitioner was also issued with the Street Vendor Identity Card (Annexure-4) and Certificate of Street Vending on 1st August, 2020 (Annexure-3), which was valid up to 1st August, 2021. It is his submission that ordinarily a Street Vending Certificate is granted for a period of five years. But, erroneously the Deputy Commissioner, BMC granted it for a period of one year. However, the Petitioner is still running a hotel under a thatched roof. Due to developmental work, the Petitioner is threatened of eviction. Hence, this writ petition has been filed for the aforesaid relief.

4. It is submitted that the Petitioner is still running his business and earning his livelihood at the place, i.e., Plot No.970/1489, Khata No.235, near Ashok Nagar, city bus stand, Master Canteen Bhubaneswar. He has applied for renewal of his Street Vending Certificate, which is pending with the Commissioner, BMC. It is submitted that till consideration of his application, the Petitioner should not be evicted from the place where he is running his business.

5. Upon hearing Mr. Puspalaka, learned counsel for the Petitioner and on perusal of the record, it appears that no application in Form-II under the Scheme framed under the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 has been filed before the Town Vending Committee, BMC. Town Vending Committee is Opposite Party No.4 in the writ petition.

6. However, taking into consideration that the Petitioner was granted a Street Vending Certificate on 1st August, 2020 under Annexure-3, this Court disposes of the writ petition with a direction that in the event, the Petitioner files an application in proper format complete in all respect within a period of two weeks hence before the Town Vending Committee, BMC, the same shall be considered in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably, within a period of one month therefrom.

7. Till consideration of his application, if any, filed within the time stipulated as above, the Petitioner shall not be evicted from the place where he is running his business, if not evicted in the meantime.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

(K.R. Mohapatra)

Judge (S.K. Mishra)

Judge Himansu Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: HIMANSU SEKHAR DASH Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 08-Apr-2026 11:40:49

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top