SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 3189

ORISSA HIGH COURT
SUMITRA SETHY – Appellant
Versus
THE INDIAN RAILWAYS NEW DELHI – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.6182 of 2025 In the matter of an Application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 ***

Smt. Sumitra Sethy …. Petitioner -Versus-

The Indian Railways and others …. Opposite Parties Advocates appeared in this case:

For Petitioner : Mr. Shanti Prakash Mohanty Advocate For Opposite : Mr.Prasanna Kumar Parhi, Parties Deputy Solicitor General of India along with Mr.Satya Sindhu Kasyap, Senior Panel Counsel CORAM:

HON’ BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

J U D G M E N T

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date of hearing : 06.05.2026 : Date of Judgment: 06.05.2026 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

HARISH TANDON, CJ.-

1. Often the question arises in the spate of litigations poured into the docket of this Court as to whether the issuance of show cause notice before the authorities proceeded to blacklist or debar the person is mandatory, even if there is no specific provisions contained in the contract or the statutory document in this regard.

2. The instant case is one of such example where the tender floa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top