SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 3277

ORISSA HIGH COURT
SUNITA CHOUDHURY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK Date: 24-Mar-2026 16:52:38 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No.708 of 2024 (A petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.)

Sunita Choudhury …. Petitioner (s)

-versus-

State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Party (s)

Advocates appeared in the case through Hybrid Mode:

For Petitioner (s) : Mr. Banshidhar Baug, Sr. Adv.

along with associates For Opposite Party (s) : Mr. Udit Ranjan Jena, AGA Mr. Arun Kumar Nayak, Adv.

(for O.P.2) CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI DATE OF HEARING:-18.02.2026 DATE OF JUDGMENT:-13.03.2026 Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi, J.

1. The Petitioner, in the present petition, seeks quashing of Bhubaneswar SCV P.S. Case No.13 dated 02.11.2023 registered under Sections 465, 467, 468, 471, 420, 506 and 120-B of the IPC against him and others.

I. FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE

2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:

i. Harihar Rath, father of Opposite Party No.3, was the owner in possession of the land in question prior to 1964. He sold the said land to Baja Mahabhoi, S/o Raghu Mahabhoi of Village Page 1

Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK

Date: 24-Mar-2026 16:52:38 Kalarahanga, Bhubaneswar, by registered Sale Deed No

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top