SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 3296

ORISSA HIGH COURT
ROHIT KUMAR SAHOO – Appellant
Versus
NIHAR RANJAN SAHOO – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK (In the matter of application under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988).

MACA No.329 of 2024 Rohit Kumar Sahoo Appellant Mr. B. Mohanty, Advocate -versus-

Nihar Ranjan Sahoo and Respondents another Ms. R.B. Pati, Advocate (R-2)

MACA No.726 of 2024 The Divisional Manager, Appellant Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Bhubaneswar Ms. R.B. Pati, Advocate -versus-

Rohit Kumar Sahoo and another Respondents Mr. B. Mohanty, Advocate(R-1)

CORAM:

JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY DATE OF HEARING : 12.05.2026 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 15.05.2026 G. Satapathy, J.

1. Instant two appeals U/S. 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (in short, the “Act”) assail the judgment dated 06.11.2023 passed in MAC Case No.172 of 2017 by which the learned Add. District Judge-cum-

III Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Dhenkanal (in short, “the Tribunal”) directed the Divisional Manager, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. (in short, “the insurer”) to pay Rs.3,39,970/- together with simple interest @ 7% per annum with effect from 26.07.2017 till its realization to one Rohit Kumar Sahoo (in short, “the claimant”) towards injuries sustained by him in a Motor Vehicular Accident in an application U/S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top