SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 3297

ORISSA HIGH COURT
AKSHAYA KUMAR SAHOO – Appellant
Versus
KANHU CHARAN SAHOO – Respondent


G. Satapathy, J.

1. These two appeals U/S. 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (in short, the “Act”), assail the impugned judgment dated 17.01.2025 passed in MAC Case No.697 of 2016 by which the learned 3rd Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Cuttack (in short, “the Tribunal”) directed M/s. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. (in short, “the insurer”) to pay a sum of Rs.20,70,271/- only to one Akshaya Kumar Sahoo (in short, “the claimant”) for the injuries sustained by him in a motor vehicular accident.

The aforesaid award carries further simple interest @ 7% per annum w.e.f. date of filing of application i.e. 20.10.2016 till its realization and the insurer was directed to pay the compensation within two months of passing of the aforesaid award, failing which to pay penal interest @ 12% per annum.

2. Briefly stated, the claimant was working as a helper in the Truck bearing Regd. No. OD-07-A-8393(hereinafter referred to as the “offending vehicle”) and on 09.04.2016 at about 12.30PM, the offending Truck met with an accident by dashing another Truck from behind, as a result the claimant sustained multiple compound fractures on his left leg femur, left lower limb, fracture of le

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top