SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 3299

ORISSA HIGH COURT
KSHIRODINI@KHIRODINI SUNA – Appellant
Versus
DINAMANI SUNA – Respondent


A.C. Behera, J. This 2nd appeal has been filed by the Appellant/Wife challenging the judgment and decree dated 19.04.2016 and 04.05.2016 respectively passed in MAT Appeal No.01/98 of 2012/2013 by the learned Additional District Judge, Padampur in the District of Bargarh on the ground of inadequacy of the amount of permanent alimony passed in her favour praying for enhancement of the same.

2. The Respondent and Appellant in this 2nd appeal being the husband and wife respectively, they were the Petitioner and Respondent before the learned Trial Court in the suit vide Civil Suit (MAT) No.36 of 2010 under Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and Respondent and Appellant before the learned 1st Appellate Court in the 1st Appeal vide MAT Appeal No.01/98 of 2012/2013.

3. The factual backgrounds of this 2nd appeal, which prompted the Appellant/Wife for filing the same is that, the Respondent/Husband being the Petitioner filed the suit vide Civil Suit (MAT) No.36 of 2010 under Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 against his wife (Appellant in this 2nd appeal) arraying her as Respondent praying for passing a decree of divorce dissolving his marriage with his wife

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top