SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 3301

ORISSA HIGH COURT
AJAY KUMAR SAHOO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 22321 of 2020 Ajay Kumar Sahoo & others …. Petitioners Mr. A. Tripathy, Advocate -

-Versus State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Ms. B.K. Sahu, AGA CORAM:

JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK DATE OF HEARING:29.01.2026 DATE OF JUDGMENT:15.05.2026

1. The present writ petition is filed by the petitioners with a direction to the opposite party to forthwith issue orders of regularization of their services as Drivers in the establishment with effect from 17th September, 2013 in the scale of pay of Rs.5200-20200/- with Grade Pay of Rs.1500/- with usual allowances admissible as per G.A. Department Resolution dated 17th September, 2013 in the same manner as other similarly situated contractual Drivers have been allowed in terms of Annexure-4 series and the decisions of the Apex Court in Secretary, State of Karnataka & others Vrs. Umadevi (3) & others (2006) 4 SCC 1 and State of Karnataka & others Vrs. M.L. Kesari & others (2010) 9 SCC 247 besides the order in W.P.(C) No.20629 of 2020.

2. The petitioners were allowed to continue as DLR Drivers in Finance Department until 28th February, 2006 and thereafter, they were posted as Direct Contractual Drivers w.e.f. 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top