SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 9397

PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy
PURUSHOTAM KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1610 of 2022

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2021 Thana- ARWAL District- Jehanabad

======================================================

PURUSHOTAM KUMAR Son of Surendra Prasad Singh Resident of Village-

Santawan Bigha, P.S.- Arwal, District- Arwal.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate

Mr. Shambhu Sharan Singh, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY

ORAL ORDER

3

06-01-2023

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant

of regular bail in a case registered under sections 366A of the

Indian Penal Code to which section 376 of the Indian Penal

Code and section 4 of the POCSO Act were added later.

As per the prosecution case, the 16 year old

daughter of the informant was taken away for the purpose of

marriage by the petitioner.

It is submitted by learned Senior coun

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top