SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3953

PATNA HIGH COURT
MOHIT KUMAR SHAH, J
Raja Ram Mehta – Appellant
Versus
Manju Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr.Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate

ORAL JUDGMENT

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s) :-

“1. That this an application for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction for setting aside the order dated

28.05.14, passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna in Matrimonial Case No.698 of 2011 (Annexure-7) whereby and whereunder the Learned Family Court while allowing the petition dated 17.11.11, filed by the respondent’s wife for grant of maintenance pendente lite u/s 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, directed the petitioner to pay Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) per month to the respondent towards her maintenance pendente lite from the date of application i.e. from 17.11.11. The petitioner was further directed to pay Rs.25,000/- as litigation cost to the respondent.”

2. The learned counsel for the parties have pointed out, at the outset, that earlier writ petitions were being filed against the interlocutory orders (such orders which have not finally decided the suits or proceedings in favour of the parties and the suits or such proceedings have not stood disposed off), in view of the law laid down by the learned Division Bench of this Court in a judgment dated 13.05.2010, passed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top