ORAL JUDGMENT

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

Date : 19-03-2024 Repetitive actions for the same relief, in law, cannot be appreciated as tenacity of the petitioner, but in legal parlance will be termed as a clear abuse of process of law; which the present writ petition surely is.

2. The instant case is the third attempt of the petitioner to agitate the very same cause before the writ Court. This time over, the petitioner succeeded, with the learned Single Judge directing the Managing Director of the respondent Co-operative Society to grant relief as prayed for by the petitioner in the representation, in terms of the cited judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and this Court. We cannot but say that neither the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court nor of this court would be applicable and the direction to grant the relief would preempt any judicious consideration by the authority. The petitioner’s claim is for disbursement of salary between April- 1991 to 29.03.2005 and from 16.11.2005 to 12.01.2006, payable by BISCOMAUN, which claim as of now is grossly delayed.

3. We have heard Mr. Ashish Giri, learned Counsel for the appellant and Mr. Shashank Chouhan, learned Counsel appearing