2023 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 9719
PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh
Dharamdeo Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CWJC/9718/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9718 of 2021
======================================================
Dharamdeo Choudhary Son of Saryug Chaudhary Resident of Devi Sarai
Police Station- Deep Nagar, District- Nalanda at present Posted as Assistant
Settlement Officer, Settlement Office, Purnea, District- Purnea.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and
Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The State Chief Information Officer State Information Commission,
Information Building 4th Floor Bailey Road, Patna.
3.
The Secretary Bihar Rajya Suchna Ayog, Suchna Bhawan, 4th Floor, Bailey
Road, Patna- 800015.
4.
The District Magistrate Samastipur.
5.
First Appellate Authority cum Sub Divisional Officer Simri Bakhtiyarpur,
Saharsa.
6.
Lok Suchna Padadhikari cum Anchala Adhikari Simri Bakhtiyarpur,
Saharsa.
7.
Anil Kumar Gupta, I.P.S. Son of Not Known Resident of Block Chowk
Simri Bakhtiyarpur, Police Station- Bakhtiyarpur, District- Saharsa.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha, Advocate
For the State
:
Mr. Lalit Kishore,Sr. Advocate
Ms. Binita Singh, Advocate
Ms. Kumari Amrita, GP-3
Mr. M.K. Upadhyay, AC to GP-3
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
ORAL ORDER
4
02-02-2023
Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated
20.10.2020 passed by State Information Commission in which
he has made liable to pay Rs. 12,500/- penalty for not providing
requisite information sought under Right to Information Act by
respondent no. 7-Anil Kumar Gupta.
Patna High Court CWJC No.9718 of 2021(4) dt.02-02-2023
2/4
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner submitted that an information was sought on
17.04.2017 in requisite form K by respondent no. 7-Anil Kumar
Gupta. During the said period Mr. Dharamendra Pandit was the
Circle Officer posted at Simri Bakhtiyarpur. The petitioner-Mr.
Dharamdeo Choudhary had joined Circle Office, Simri
Bakhtiyarpur on 19.07.2018. It is submitted that he was not
informed by his office about the pending informations sought
under the Right to Information Act, however, pursuant to the
notice issued by the Commission dated 12.03.2019, he give the
requisite information to the person who had sought. Learned
counsel further submitted that the period during which petitioner
was in the Circle Office whole nation was affected by COVID-
19 pandemic.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State
Information Commission submitted that world knows that
COVID-19 pandemic effect over country sometime in October
2019 and the period during which the petitioner was posted in
the Circle Office, Simri Bakhtiyarpur was before the COVID-19
pandemic. It was statutory duty of the petitioner to provide the
requisite information which was not provided by his
predecessor. It is admitted that the information was provided
Patna High Court CWJC No.9718 of 2021(4) dt.02-02-2023
3/4
after a period of eight months from the date of his joining on the
post of Circle Officer but the information was given only after
service of notice to the petitioner on 12.03.2019 to the aggrieved
party. From the period 19.07.2018 to 12.03.2019, the petitioner
deliberately did not provide information as per the statutory
provision. The period cannot be accounted for COVID-19
pandemic.
5. Having heard the rival submission of the parties
and materials on record, it appears that the petitioner had joined
on 19.07.2018 and a notice dated 12.02.2019 was issued by the
commission to him. He had not provided any information which
was sought by the party before the date of notice. A show cause
filed by the petitioner on 26.04.2019 and the same was not
found satisfactory, therefore, a penalty of Rs. 12,50