SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3890

PATNA HIGH COURT
Gopal Prasad Sah – Appellant
Versus
Manoj Kumar – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 30-10-2024 Heard learned counsels for the respective parties.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated

22.09.2022 passed by the learned District Delegate-cum-Sub Judge-1, Bhagalpur in Probate Case No. 22 of 2018 whereby and whereunder the learned Sub Judge rejected the petition dated 17.06.2022 filed by the petitioner under Section 295 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is one of the objectors in the Probate Case No. 22 of 2018. The petitioner filed an application under Section 295 of the Act in the aforesaid probate case for direction to proceed in the in the form of a regular suit. But the learned Sub Judge-1, Bhagalpur dismissed the application dated 17.06.2022 under erroneous consideration of the facts and the laws. The learned counsel further submits that the order is perverse since the learned trial court has mentioned the fact that after notice, the opposite party has appeared and filed his written objection challenging the genuineness of the Will while asserting that the petitioner of the probate case has forged and fabricated the Will by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top