PATNA HIGH COURT
Om Prakash Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 19-11-2024 I.A.No.01 of 2024 The instant interlocutory application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for amendment in the cause title by impleading/adding the name of Mahendra Singh as party respondent no. 3 in the present petition.
2. The learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that due to inadvertence, earlier the said Mahendra Singh could not be made as a party respondent in the present civil miscellaneous petition and the details of the said Mahendra Singh have been mentioned in paragraph 2 of the instant interlocutory application. The learned senior counsel further submits that the said Mahendra Singh is a necessary party, who is respondent in Title Appeal No. 05/2021, which has been pending in the court of learned Additional District Judge-
III, Kaimur at Bhabhua.
3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and the averments made in this interlocutory application, I.A. No.
01 of 2024 is allowed.
4. Office is directed to make necessary correction in the cause title of the instant case by adding the person named in paragraph 2 of the instant interlocutory application as respondent no.3.
Civil Misc. No.944 of 2023
5. Heard
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.