SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 583

PATNA HIGH COURT
Navnit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The Bihar Staff Selection Commission – Respondent


CAV JUDGMENT

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

Date : 12-01-2024 The tricky question of reservation and the mandate to confine it to 50%; so as to not compromise merit is the subject matter agitated herein. The application of the principle, on the facts of the case resulted in meritorious reserved candidates (for brevity, ‘the MRC’) being given their choice districts; enabled only by reason of their higher merit, leading to ouster of reserved candidates to accommodate the meritorious general candidates in the resultant vacancies.

2. Two line of decisions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, one in the matter of recruitment in public employment and the other in the matter of admissions to academic institutions were relied on by the appellant and the respondents respectively, to support their rival contentions. The appellant, the Bihar Staff Selection Commission (for brevity, ‘the BSSC’) asserts the distinction insofar as admission to academic institutions and appointment to service; while the respondents- the candidates from the reserved category, who were ousted from the select list by reason of ‘the MRC’ candidates having occupied reservation posts, assert that the principle applied in a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top