PATNA HIGH COURT
Nutan Prabha – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 16-02-2024 Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Kameshwar Kumar (GP 17) for the State as well as Mr. Md. Ziaul Quamar for the respondent nos.8 to 12.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that he does not want to seek any relief as against the petitioner no.1, namely, Nutan Prabha as she died during the pendency of writ application, as such this application become infructuous against the petitioner no.1.
3. Now, this writ application is being heard only with regard to the petitioner no.2.
4. The present writ application is being filed for the following reliefs:-
(i) For issuance of writ to quash the order dated
10.04.2019 passed in Appeal No.126 of 2019 by the State Appellate Authority, Patna whereby and whereunder the appeal No.126/2019 filed by the petitioners in terms of the order dated 31.01.2019 passed in C.W.J.C. No.6261 of 2015 has been disallowed and also to quash the order as contained in memo no.84 dated 19.03.2013 passed by the District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Arariya.
(ii) For issuance of writ for commanding and directing the respondent authorities to appoint the petitioners against the post of Panchaya
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.