SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 357

PATNA HIGH COURT
MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR, J
Md Mustafa – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
Md. Rahmatullah, Advocate; Mr. Ravi Kumar, Advocate

ORAL JUDGMENT

Heard the parties.

2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated

24.05.2024 passed by the Member (Judicial), Bihar Land Tribunal, Patna in BLT Case No. 426 of 2021, by which the application filed by the petitioners has been dismissed and the order of the Collector, Begusarai dated 07.02.2020 passed in Mutation Revision Case No. 03 of 2015 has been affirmed.

3. From the materials available on record, it appears that the petitioners are claiming the land in question appertaining to Khata No. 114, Plot No. 110 comprising area of 4 Katha 4 Dhur 15 Kanwa and Khata No. 136, Plot No. 102 measuring 14 Dhur 4 Dhurki 5 Kanwa, Tauzi No. 345, Thana No. 459, Mauza Mobarkpur, at the strength of longstanding Jamabandi running in their names and, on the basis thereof, the Circle Officer, Begusarai mutated the land in favour of the petitioners. The afore-noted lands were purchased by the petitioners through sale deed executed on 12.08.2002 in their favour by Jamabandi raiyats. On the other hand, the private respondents are claiming the land on the basis of khatiyan running in their names and also on the basis of judgment and decree passed in Title Suit No. 49 of 2001.

4. Learned Advo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top