Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH, J
Md. Kazim Halim – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's application for appointment (Para 3) |
| 2. petitioner's claim for regularization (Para 4) |
| 3. state's defense against regularization (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's analysis of compassionate appointment (Para 7) |
| 5. application of rules at the time of death (Para 8 , 9) |
| 6. writ petition allowed (Para 10 , 11) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 17-02-2025
Heard Mr. Amit Narayan, learned counsel along with Mr. Ketan Dayal, Ms. Vandana Rani and Mr. Abhigyan Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, learned AC to GP-22 for the State.
2. The petitioner in paragraph no. 1 of the present writ petition has sought, inter alia, following relief(s), which is reproduced hereinafter:-
“That this writ application is filed for regularization of service of petitioner on regular pay scale, who was appointed on compassionate on the post of teacher at fixed pay and has been working in furtherance thereof. For sake of brevity, hereinafter, every respondent is referred to as 'R' with respective number in cause title. By this instant writ application, the petitioner prays for the following reliefs:-
i. For issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to regu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
