SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 280

PATNA HIGH COURT
MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH, J
Md. Kazim Halim – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
CWJC 2547 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr.Amit Narayan, Advocate. Mr. Ketan Dayal, Advocate. Ms. Vandana Rani, Advocate. Mr. Abhigyan Kumar, Advocate. For the State: Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, AC to GP-22.

Compassionate appointments are not automatic and must adhere to the rules in force at the time of the employee's death, ensuring equitable treatment.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16 - Bihar Litigation Policy, 2011 - Compassionate appointment - Petitioner sought regularization of service as a teacher after father's death in harness - Court emphasized that compassionate appointments are not automatic and must adhere to the rules in force at the time of the employee's death - The authorities failed to consider the applicable rules at the time of the father's death, leading to inequitable treatment of the petitioner compared to similarly situated individuals. (Paras 7-9)

(B) Appointment on compassionate grounds - The court reiterated that such appointments are subject to strict scrutiny and cannot be claimed as a vested right. (Paras 18-20)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner applied for compassionate appointment following the death of his father, a teacher, in 2005. Despite recommendations, there were significant delays in processing his application, and he was appointed as a contract teacher in 2010.

Findings of Court:
The court directed the District Magistrate to rectify the appointment process and ensure compliance with the rules applicable at the time of the father's death.

Issues: The main issues included the applicability of the rules at the time of the father's death versus the time of application consideration and the equitable treatment of similarly situated individuals.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the rules governing compassionate appointments at the time of the father's death must be applied, emphasizing that compassionate appointments are not automatic and require scrutiny.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's application for appointment (Para 3)
2. petitioner's claim for regularization (Para 4)
3. state's defense against regularization (Para 5 , 6)
4. court's analysis of compassionate appointment (Para 7)
5. application of rules at the time of death (Para 8 , 9)
6. writ petition allowed (Para 10 , 11)

ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 17-02-2025

Heard Mr. Amit Narayan, learned counsel along with Mr. Ketan Dayal, Ms. Vandana Rani and Mr. Abhigyan Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, learned AC to GP-22 for the State.

2. The petitioner in paragraph no. 1 of the present writ petition has sought, inter alia, following relief(s), which is reproduced hereinafter:-

“That this writ application is filed for regularization of service of petitioner on regular pay scale, who was appointed on compassionate on the post of teacher at fixed pay and has been working in furtherance thereof. For sake of brevity, hereinafter, every respondent is referred to as 'R' with respective number in cause title. By this instant writ application, the petitioner prays for the following reliefs:-

i. For issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the petitioner on the regular post & pay scale of Teacher, with all consequential benefits, since the date of his initial joining dated 30.12.2010, as Block Teacher, as he was recommended to be appointed on compassionate on the post of 'Teacher' by District Compassionate Committee, Nawada vide Letter No. 513 dated 17.07.2008 under the schemes of Letter (Paripatra) No.- 3/C2-2067/90 Ka-13293 dated 05.10.1991 and Letter No. 3-C2-60108/94-Ka-2822, dated 27.04.1995 both issued by the then Department of Personnel & Administrative Reforms, Government of Bihar, now Department of General Administration, Government of Bihar, Patna.

ii. For issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to follow the Provision 4.C (1) of Bihar Litigation Policy, 2011 (Annexure P/18) as similarly situated persons have already been granted equitable relief by the respondents.

iii. For quashing Memo No. 336 dated 07.03.2019 (Annexure P/16) issued under the signature of Joint Secretary by the Department of Education of the Government of Bihar.

iv. For imposing considerable cost on respondent authorities for not complying with the Bihar Litigation Policy, 2011.”

Brief Facts:

3. The father of the petitioner Late Md. Halim Khan died in harness on 12.12.2005 while he was posted as Assistant Teacher at Urdu Primary School, Akbarpur, Nawada. The father of the petitioner was the sole bread earner of his family. On 14.01.2006, the petitioner made his application for appointment on compassionate ground to the concerned Headmaster of the school where his father was posted, who forwarded the application to the office of the District Compassionate Committee, Nawada. Thereafter after making inordinate unexplaned delay of more than two years, the then District Superintendent of Education, Nawada forwarded the application and all documents of the petitioner to the office of District Compassionate Committee, Nawada vide Letter No. 501 dated 15.02.2008. On 24.05.2008, in the meeting of the District Compassionate Committee, Nawada under the Chairmanship of the District Magistrate, the petitioner was recommended for appointment to the post of Teacher by Letter No. 513 dated 17.07.2008 issued under the signature of District Magistrate- cum-Chairman, Committee, Nawada. District Compassionate Committee, Nawada. The District Superintendent of Education, Nawada directed the appointment of petitioner as Teacher on fixed pay as a Contract Teacher by Letter No. 3050 dated 17.09.2008 to the Block Education Prasar Officer, Block & District- Nawada to appoint the petitioner accordingly. In light of the aforesaid direction, again after inordinate delay of more than two years, the Block Education Officer, Block & District Nawada; Authorised Officer, Block & District Nawada and Block Development Officer

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top