Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Nani Tagi, J
Dhirendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the petitioners and their grievances regarding teacher recruitment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments presented by the respondents regarding the recruitment process and eligibility. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 3. court's analysis of the recruitment process and the discrepancies in the supplementary results. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 4. court's decision directing the publication of supplementary results for vacancies. (Para 56 , 57) |
CAV JUDGMENT
Date : 18-07-2024
Heard Mr. Y.V. Giri, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner; Mr. Yogendra Prasad Sinha, learned AAG-7, representing the respondent-State and Mr. Lalit Kishore, learned Senior counsel for the respondent-B.P.S.C.
2. The petitioners have filed this writ petition with the following prayers:-
“(i) To issue an appropriate writ, order, direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent Bihar Public Service Commission to publish the supplementary / revised merit list for teachers in primar
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
