SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 81

PATNA HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
Narendra Kumar Srivastva @ Narendra Kumar Shrivastav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna – Respondent
CWJC 559 / 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:Mr.Nityanand Mishra, Advocate, Mr. Alok Abhinav, Advocate, Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Advocate
For the Respondents: Mr. Anuj Kumar, AC to GP 27

Dismissal without due process violates Article 311 rights; the court quashed ex parte orders.

Headnote:The petitioner sought relief from dismissal without departmental proceedings or opportunity of hearing, citing violations of service rights. The court found dismissal to be ex parte, violating Article 311 of the Constitution. The dismissal orders were quashed, and corrective measures were left to authorities (Paragraphs 1-8). Main issues included the legality of dismissal without due process. The court reasoned that failure to provide a hearing before dismissal constitutes a significant legal breach (Paragraph 7).

Result: The impugned orders are set aside and quashed.

Table of Content
1. summary of petitioner’s employment history and dismissal process. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. respondents argued dismissal was lawful due to petitioner providing incorrect information. (Para 5)
3. court identified violations in the dismissal process necessitating quashing the orders. (Para 6 , 7)
4. court finalized the decision to quash the dismissal orders. (Para 8)

ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 23-01-2025 Heard Mr. Nityanand Mishra along with Mr. Alok Abhinav and Mr. Abhishek Mishra, learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr.Anuj Kumar, learned AC to GP 27 for the State.

2. Petitioner has inter alia prayed for following reliefs in the paragraphs No.1 of the writ petition:-

“(I) For issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing and setting aside the order issued vide Memo No.1234 dated 19.07.2023 (Annexure – P/11) by the Joint Secretary-cum-Director, Mass Education (Jan Shiksha) (respondent no.5), whereby and whereunder the petitioner has been awarded punishment of dismissal from service since the date of appointment and also directed to make recovery of paid salary in one time which has been paid to the petitioner during his service period and also directed not to pay any heed of the retirement benefits, without initiating any departmental proceeding against the petitioner and without providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

ii. For further quashing and setting aside the official order issued vide Memo No.133 dated 25.07.2023 (Anneuxre-P/12) issued by signature of the District Education Officer, Saran at Chapra (respondent no.8), in view of the order issued vide Memo No.1234 dated 19.07.2023 (Annexure-P/11) by which the petitioner has been awarded punishment of dismissal from service since the date of appointment and also directed to make recovery of paid salary in one time which has been paid to the petitioner during his service period and also directed not to pay any heed of the retirement benefits, without initiating any departmental proceeding against the petitioner and without providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

iii. Further for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing/commanding the respondents’ especially respondent nos.5 and 8, to reinstate the petitioner in his service since the date of dismissal along with all benefits as well as retirement benefits with immediate effect.

iv. Further for directing/commanding the respondents to grant stay with immediate effect on the orders issued vides Memo No.1234 dated 19.07.2023 and Memo No.133 dated 25.07.2023 (Annexure-P/11 & P/12 respectively) during pending/disposal of the present writ application.

v. Further for direction to the authorities/

respondents concerned to punish the erring Officials and pay compensation to the petitioner for mental agony, physical and financial harassment of the petitioner and his family members who suffers a lot due to illegal dismissal from service along with retirement benefits of the petitioner.

vi. For any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner is entitled to in accordance with law.”

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner was absorbed as Class IV employee in Lokmanya High School, Rajapatti, Kudariya, District, Saran at Chapra and he gave his joining on 16.01.2018. In respect of the same, he has placed reliance on the noting made in the service book by the principal of the School, whereby the service of the petitioner has been certified since 16.01.2018 to 31.07.2023 (Annexure P/7). Learned counsel submitted that above exercise was undertaken by the principal in light of the directive contained in SLA (C) No.32079 of 2015 dated 26.02.2016 by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The Director, Mass Education (Jan Shiksha), Bihar issued Memo No.1417 dated 21.06.2017, seeking following information in paragraph no.6 therein:

(i) regarding the date of birth certificate;

(ii) regarding Educational qualification certificate;

(iii) Proof of filing of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top