IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34199 of 2022

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2022 Thana- SISWAN District- Siwan

======================================================

Sohaib Akhtar, aged about 24 years old, Male, Son Of Shamim Akhtar

Resident Of Village- Chandpur, P.S.- Siswan, District- Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Prabhakar Singh, Adv.

For the State

:

Ms. Meena Singh, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD

ORAL ORDER

3

17-01-2023

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP

for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Siswan P.S. Case

No. 5/22 registered for the offence punishable under Section 302 of

the Indian Penal Code (for brevity ‘IPC’) and 27 of the Arms Act.

There is allegation that the informant’s brother was seated on

the bridge of the village when unknown criminals have shot him

dead. It is alleged that before victim had left his house, he has

received a call on his mobile.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nearly a month

after the alleged occurrence, some of the agnates, of the informant

have implicated the petitioner by alleging that he was having some

affair with a cousin of the instant petitioner, and therefore, the

petitioner has committed murder.

He further submits that the petitioner has no criminal

antecedents and other than such statement of the agnates, recorded

nearly one month after the First Information Report (for brevity

‘F.I.R.’) and petitioner’s own confessional statement, there is no

material whatsoever. He is stated to be in custody since 26.02.2022.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34199 of 2022(3) dt.17-01-2023

2/2

Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. It is

submitted that witness in the investigation have stated that in past

also the petitioner has threatened the deceased.

Considering the rival submissions, the manner in which the

petitioner has been implicated, period of custody viewed with his

clean antecedents in the background this Court, for the purposes of

grant of bail, is inclined to accept the submissions advanced by the

petitioner’s counsel. Prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed.

Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on

furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/– (Ten thousand) with two sureties

of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional

Chief Judicial Magistrate-IVth, Siwan, in connection with Siswan

P.S. Case No. 5/22, subject to the following conditions:-

(i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative

of the petitioner who will give an affidavit

giving genealogy as to how he is related with the

petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to

inform the Court if there is any change in the

address of the petitioner.

(ii)That the petitioner will be well represented

on each date and if he fails to do so on two

consecutive dates, his bail bond will be liable to

be cancelled.

This Court would expect that the petitioner’s counsel would

honour his undertaking in the instant proceedings regarding supply of

the requisite court fee etc. within two weeks from the date he is

called upon to do so by the office.

rajkishore/-

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

U

T