2023 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 6233
PRINCIPAL BENCH PATNA
DAYA SHANKAR RAUT @ DAYA SHANKAR PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CR. APP (SJ) 2297 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2297 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-430 Year-2022 Thana- PAHARPUR District- East Champaran
======================================================
1.
DAYA SHANKAR RAUT @ DAYA SHANKAR PRASAD Son of Late
Ram Prasad Raut Resident of village - Sareya Khan, P.S.- Paharpur, District
- East Champaran
2.
Sandip Raut Son of Jhagru Raut Resident of village - Sareya Khan, P.S.-
Paharpur, District - East Champaran
3.
Nitesh Raut Son of Manoj Raut Resident of village - Sareya Khan, P.S.-
Paharpur, District - East Champaran
4.
Tappu Raut Son of Jhagru Raut Resident of village - Sareya Khan, P.S.-
Paharpur, District - East Champaran
5.
Jhagru Raut Son of Late Sheonath Raut Resident of village - Sareya Khan,
P.S.- Paharpur, District - East Champaran
6.
Raj Kishore Raut Son of Nagina Raut Resident of village - Sareya Khan,
P.S.- Paharpur, District - East Champaran
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar Bihar
2.
Lalsha Devi Wife of Ramchandra Ram Resident of village - Sareya Mishrain
Tola, P.S.- Paharpur, District - East Champaran
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s
:
Mr. Abhishek Kumar
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr. Sadanand Paswan
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
ORAL ORDER
4
08-11-2023
Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned
Special Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. In compliance of the order dated 23.08.2023, learned
Spl.PP for the State informed the informant to appear in the
present case through her counsel but nobody entered appearance
on her behalf.
3. This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2297 of 2023(4) dt.08-11-2023
2/3
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of
Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter in short referred to as the
'SC/ST Act') against the refusal of prayer of anticipatory bail
vide order dated 31.03.2023 passed by learned Special Judge
(SC/ST Act), East Champaran, Motihari in connection with
Paharpur P.S. Case No.430 of 2022, registered under Sections
341, 323, 324, 379, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and
Section 3(1) (r) (s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled
Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
4. The allegation against the appellants is that they abused
the informant by taking her caste name and also assaulted her
and her family members and took out Rs.5000/- from her
husband.
5. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellants
that the appellants have no concern with the aforesaid
occurrence. They have been falsely implicated in the case due to
dirty village politics. The allegation of assault levelled against
the appellants is not specific rather general and omnibus in
nature. Slating the informant/complainant in the name of caste is
said to have been made at the house of the informant and not in
public view, hence no offence under SC/ST Act is made out
against the appellants. There is no specific overt act against the
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2297 of 2023(4) dt.08-11-2023
3/3
appellants. Appellants have two criminal antecedent as
mentioned in para-3 of memo of appeal.
6. Learned Spl. PP for the State opposed the prayer for
bail.
7. In the facts and circumstances of the case as there is
no specific overt act against the appellants, let the above named
appellants, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the
learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today,
be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-
(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the
like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special
Judge (SC/ST Act), East Champaran, Motihari in connection
with Paharpur P.S. Case No.430 of 2022, subject to the
condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
8. Accordi