SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 350

PATNA HIGH COURT
MOHIT KUMAR SHAH, J
Majloom Dhobi and Ors – Appellant
Versus
Bhola Mian and Ors – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr.Shailendra Kumar, Adv.

ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 21-08-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- “1. That the present application is being filed for quashing the order dated 6.1.2015, passed by Munsif, Rosere, in Title Suit No. 40 of 2007, whereby and whereunder the application dated 31.10.2013, filed under Order 1 Rule 10 by one Bijo Yadav, was allowed illegally, when his two applications, filed earlier for adding him as intervenor defendant, were rejected.”

2. The learned counsel for the parties have pointed out, at the outset, that earlier writ petitions were being filed against the interlocutory orders (such orders which have not finally decided the suits or proceedings in favour of the parties and the suits or such proceedings have not stood disposed off), in view of the law laid down by the learned Division Bench of this Court in a judgment dated 13.05.2010, passed in C.R. no. 1067 of 2009 (Durga Devi v. Vijay Kumar Poddar & Ors.), however, subsequently, the Hon’ble Apex Court, by a judgment rendered in the case of Radhey Shyam and Another v. Chhabi Nath and Others, reported in (2015) 5 SCC 423, has held that judicial orders of the Civil Court are not amenable to writ ju

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top