SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 307

PATNA HIGH COURT
Raj Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 26-03-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner superannuated from the post of Peon, while working in the Rural Works Department, Work Division, Mahnar, Vaishali, long back on 31.10.2004. Notwithstanding his superannuation in the year 2004, when the petitioner has not been accorded his arrears of pension with Dearness Allowances, Medical Allowances as well as other allowances along with consequential benefits in view of 5th and 6th Pay Revision, the petitioner has preferred the present writ petition.

3. Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, learned Advocate for the petitioner taking this Court through the counter affidavit and the letter of the Accountant General, Bihar dated 25.10.2023 has contended that admittedly the pension of the petitioner was duly revised pursuant to the letter no. 1228 dated 17.08.2023, however, till date the other admissible amount on account of revision of pension has not been accorded to him.

4. Mr. Aman Priyadarshi, learned Advocate for the State referring to the counter affidavit submits that the grievance of the petitioner to the extent of revision of pension has already been redressed. Moreover, if there is still any grievance, the same is requi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top