SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3803

PATNA HIGH COURT
MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR, J
Niraj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CWJC 15126 / 2024



Advocates:
Mr. Saket Tiwary, Advocate; Mr. Basant Vikash, AC to G.P.- 12

Administrative proceedings cannot proceed when a related Title Suit is pending in civil court, emphasizing the precedence of judicial processes.

Headnote:(A) Bihar Land Dispute Resolution Act - Proceedings initiated by Deputy Collector Land Reforms - Jurisdictional challenge - Petitioner purchased land through registered sale deed, mutation completed, and Jamabandi created - Pending Title Suit and Jamabandi Cancellation Case - Court held that the DCLR proceedings are without jurisdiction due to the ongoing Title Suit. (Paras 2-4)

(B) Jurisdiction - The court emphasized that matters pending before civil courts must be resolved there before administrative proceedings can continue. (Paras 4-6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner purchased land on 22.09.2020, with mutation and Jamabandi completed. A Title Suit and a Jamabandi Cancellation Case are pending, while the respondent initiated a Land Dispute Resolution Case.

Findings of Court:
The court found the DCLR proceedings to be without jurisdiction due to the pending Title Suit and allowed the petitioner to raise objections before the DCLR.

Issues: The main issue was whether the DCLR had jurisdiction to proceed with the Land Dispute Resolution Case given the pending Title Suit.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that ongoing civil proceedings take precedence over administrative actions, and the petitioner should be allowed to present his objections regarding jurisdiction.

Result: Writ petition disposed of.

ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 07-10-2024 Heard Mr. Saket Tiwari, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Basant Vikash, learned Advocate for the State.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the initiation of the proceedings of Land Dispute Resolution Case No. 31 of 2024-25 by the Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Begusarai at the instance of private respondent no.4.

3. Learned Advocate for the petitioner contended that the land, in question, was purchased by the petitioner through registered sale deed on 22.09.2020. Having purchased the land, he came in possession thereof and mutation has also been done and Jamabandi is also created in the name of the petitioner. In the meanwhile, one Lalit Kumar filed a petition for cancellation of Jamabandi of the petitioner vide Jamabandi Cancellation Case No. 79 of 2022, which is pending before the concerned Additional Collector. It is further contended that with respect to the land, in question, Title Suit No. 36 of 2022, is pending before the learned Sub-Judge, Begusarai, wherein the private respondent has also sought a relief for cancellation of sale deed executed in favour of the petitioner.

4. While the matters, aforenoted, have been pending before the competent authorities, in the meantime, the respondent no.4 approached before the learned Deputy Collector Land Reforms (hereinafter referred to as ‘the DCLR’) by filing Bihar Land Dispute Resolution Case No. 31 of 2024-25; and the learned DCLR has admitted the aforesaid case and issued notice to the petitioner. The entire proceeding arising out of Bihar Land Dispute Resolution Case No. 31 of 2024-25 is wholly without jurisdiction, as with regard to the land, in question, a Title Suit is pending consideration before the civil court of competent jurisdiction, is the contention of the learned Advocate.

5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State contended that if the petitioner has any grievance with regard to the maintainability of the Bihar Land Dispute Resolution Case No. 31 of 2024-25, he has the remedy to approach before the learned DCLR and bring the entire facts.

6. Considering the nature of the grievance and the contentions advanced on behalf of the parties, this Court deems it fit and proper to dispose of writ petition with a liberty to the petitioner to approach before the learned DCLR, Begusarai and bring the entire facts, including the factum of pendency of the title suit as also the law, on which he is basing his claim.

7. Suffice it to say that if the petitioner approaches before the learned DCLR, Begusarai preferably within a period of four weeks from today, the respondent DCLR, Begusarai shall decide the objection of the petitioner as preliminary objection with regard to the maintainability of Bihar Land Dispute Resolution Case No. 31 of 2024-25 within a further period of eight weeks, before proceeding any further in the matter.

8. The writ petition stands disposed off.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top