Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN, J
Kamini Kumari – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of petitioners' claims for reinstatement. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. petitioners' appeal against state appellate authority's order. (Para 8 , 10 , 12) |
| 3. good governance principles requiring fairness and adherence to law. (Para 14 , 19) |
| 4. legal framework governing appointments and recruitment validity. (Para 21 , 25 , 31) |
| 5. final dismissal of writ petitions. (Para 39 , 40) |
C.A.V. JUDGMENT
Date : 07-03-2025
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. As the common question of fact and law involved in all these writ applications, with consent of all the parties, all these applications have been heard together for final disposal at this stage itself.
3. In all these writ applications, the petitioners seek quashing of the orders passed by the State Appellate Authority, Education Department, in various appeals, whereby the appointments of the petitioners in the present batch of writ applications have been cancelled with retrospective effect from the date of their respective appointments and to reinstate them with consequential benefits. The impugned orders direct the removal of the petitioners from service within a fortnight by
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
