ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 17-02-2025

Heard Mr. Vijoy Nandan Sahay, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Girijish Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The petitioner, who superannuated from the post of Assembly Operator Technician, Bihar State Electronic Development Corporation, Patna (for brevity “Beltron”), on being aggrieved by the action of the respondent authorities in not regularizing his services, has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court seeking a direction to consider his case for regularization with effect from the date when the services of the juniors to the petitioner have been regularized with all consequential benefits.

3. The brief facts of the case, as narrated by the petitioner in the writ petition, are that the petitioner was duly appointed on the post of Assembly Operator Technician on 21.07.1986 on daily wage basis. Subsequent thereto, the service of the petitioner was terminated on 06.11.1987, which order was put to question by raising an industrial dispute and accordingly, the matter was referred to Labour Court in Reference Case No. 10 of 1990. Pursuant to the award dated 12.08.1991, the petitioner was reinstated in service with full back wages along w