SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3455

PATNA HIGH COURT
Vinod Kumar Sinha – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)

Date : 05-07-2024 Appellant has assailed the order of the learned Single Judge dated 13.11.2019 passed in C.W.J.C. No.

19802 of 2019.

2. Grievance of the appellant is in respect of regulating the suspension period as a duty from the date of suspension till passing of a dismissal order. Dismissal order was modified by the Appellate Authority to withholding of three annual increments without cumulative effect. The learned Single Judge has not apprised the factual material information to the extent that there is no order of regulating the suspension period. In the counter affidavit, in the present L.P.A, Respondent Nos. 3 to 6 have furnished Annexures – A, B and C. Learned counsel for the Respondent pointed out Annexure- C suffice to the grievance of the appellant to the extent of regulating the suspension period. It is necessary to reproduce Annexure-C dated 05.06.2015 and it reads as under:-

lekgj.kky; floku ¼ftyk LFkkiuk ”kk[kk½ &% vkns”k %&

vk;qDr lkj.k ize.My] Nijk ds U;k;ky; esa lsok vihy la0&310@2014 fouksn dqekj flUgk cuke~ ftyk inkf/kdkjh] floku esa ikfjr vkns”k ds vkyksd esa Jh fouksn dqekj flUgk] fyfid dk fnukad&02-05-2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top