SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 11401

PATNA HIGH COURT
Santosh Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


CAV JUDGMENT

Date : 17-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Bihar Staff Selection Commission.

2. On the request of the parties, these writ applications have been tagged and after hearing the parties, all these matters are being disposed of by this common judgment.

3. For purpose of reference C.W.J.C. No. 2049 of 2022 has been taken as a lead case.

4. The petitioners in these writ applications are praying for a direction to the respondents Bihar Staff Selection Commission (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Commission’) to take steps to conduct interview for the petitioners to fill up the vacancies notified vide Advertisement No. 08010116 published on

06.05.2016.

Brief facts and case of the petitioners The petitioners pray that a direction be issued to the respondent authorities to consider the petitioners for appointment against the 276 posts of Sanitary Inspector after evaluating the petitioners in interview. The grievance of the petitioners is that as against 276 posts,130 were called for counselling but finally only 29 candidates have been declared successful and the petitioners have been excluded from the zone of co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top