SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 1339

PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman
Meena Kumari – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CWJC/12600/2021



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12600 of 2021

======================================================

Meena Kumari Daughter of Late Ramashish Prasad, Wife of Shri Kailash

Mahto, Resident of Village/Mohalla - Anand Nagar, Mohanpur, Ward No. 09,

Post office - Bariyarpur, Police Station- Sitamarhi, District - Sitamarhi.

Retired while working as a Block Education Officer, Benipatti, Block -

Benipatti, District - Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The Additional Chief Secretary-cum-the Principal Secretary, Education

Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Patna.

4.

The Deputy Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Patna.

5.

The District Education Officer, Madhubani.

6.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Madhubani.

7.

The Block Education Officer, Benipatti, District - Madhubani.

8.

The District Treasury Officer, Madhubani.

9.

The District Accounts Officer, Madhubani.

10.

The Accountant General, Veerchand Patel Path, Bihar, Patna.

11.

The Pay and Accounts Officer, Pay and Accounts Officer, Mahalekhakar

Bhavan, Birchand Patel Path, Bailey Road, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Adv.

For the Respondent/s

:

Mr. Rajeev Ranjan AC to GP-20

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN

ORAL ORDER

4

24-01-2023

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

counsel for the State.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that counter

affidavit has been received and he seeks two weeks time.

Counsel for the State categorically mentioned that in

the counter affidavit it has been clearly stated in paragraph no.7

Patna High Court CWJC No.12600 of 2021(4) dt.24-01-2023

2/2

that admissible dues have been paid to the petitioner.

In this background, this application is disposed of

directing the petitioner that upon going through the counter

affidavit, if he found anything not paid or some part which is

still left found due, he may file representation in this regard

within 6 weeks from the date of passing of this order and

authority will decide the same within 10 weeks thereafter.

With this direction, the writ application is hereby

disposed off.

ritik/-

(Dr. Anshuman, J.)

U

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top