SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 93

PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Jha
PAWAN KUMAR SINGH @ PAWAN SINGH @ PAWAN – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. MISC./60494/2022



A person accused of an offence under the Bihar Prohibition Act and Excise Act is entitled to bail if he is not apprehended from the spot and no recovery is made from his conscious possession.

Headnote:

BAIL - BIHAR PROHIBITION ACT - SECTION 30(A) - EXCISE ACT - BAIL GRANTED - PETITIONER NOT APPREHENDED FROM THE SPOT - NO RECOVERY FROM HIS CONSCIOUS POSSESSION - NAMED IN THE CASE ON THE DISCLOSURE OF THE CO-ACCUSED PERSONS - OTHER CO-ACCUSED PERSONS GRANTED BAIL - CHARGE SHEET SUBMITTED - PERIOD OF CUSTODY OF THE PETITIONER

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was arrested in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition Act and Excise Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was the intended recipient of 108 litres of beer and 150 litres of country-made liquor seized from two co-accused persons. The petitioner was not apprehended from the spot and no recovery was made from his conscious possession.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner was not apprehended from the spot and no recovery was made from his conscious possession. The court also noted that the other co-accused persons had been granted bail and that the charge sheet had been submitted against the petitioner.

Issues: Whether the petitioner should be granted bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner was entitled to bail as he was not apprehended from the spot and no recovery was made from his conscious possession. The court also considered the fact that the other co-accused persons had been granted bail and that the charge sheet had been submitted against the petitioner.

Final Decision: The court granted bail to the petitioner on the condition that he furnish bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60494 of 2022

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-416 Year-2021 Thana- BANIAPUR District- Saran

======================================================

Pawan Kumar Singh @ Pawan Singh @ Pawan Son of Prabhat Singh R/v-

Ibrahimpur P.S.- Baniyapur, District- Saran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Harsh Anuj, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA

ORAL ORDER

2

04-01-2023

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

APP for the State.

In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in

connection with Baniyapur P.S.Case No. 416 of 2021 registered

for the alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar

Prohibition Act and Excise Act.

As per prosecution case, two co-accused persons were

apprehended with 108 litres of beer and 150 litres of country

made liquor. The apprehended co-accused persons named the

petitioner as the intended recipient of the illicit liquor.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

petitioner was not apprehended from the spot and no recovery

has been shown from his conscious possession. He has been

named in this case on the disclosure of the co-accused persons,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60494 of 2022(2) dt.04-01-2023

2/3

but the petitioner has got no concern with the seized illicit

liquor. Learned counsel further submits that other co-accused

persons have been granted bail vide orders dated 07.06.2022 in

Cr. Misc. No. 21500 of 2022 and 26.08.2022 in Cr. Misc. No.

42752 of 2022 by a learned Coordinate Bench. The case of the

petitioner stands on similar footing. The petitioner is in custody

since 08.09.2022 and charge sheet has been submitted.

Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the

fact that the petitioner was not apprehended from the spot and

no recovery has been shown from him and further considering

grant of bail to other co-accused persons along with the period

of custody of the petitioner and submission of charge-sheet

against him, the petitioner above named is directed to be

released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of learned Court of 1st Exclusive Special Excise

Court, Saran at Chapra in connection with Baniyapur P.S.Case

No. 416 of 2021, subject to the following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of

the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60494 of 2022(2) dt.04-01-2023

3/3

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and

every date fixed by the court below.

(iii) In case of absence for three consecutive dates

or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail

bond of the petitioner will be liable to be

cancelled by the court concerned.

himanshu/-

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

U

T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top