ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 22-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has been filed for quashing of Memo of Charge, Prapatra- ‘Ka’ dated 23.05.2008 (Annexure- 3/1), 2nd show cause contained in Memo No.1419 dated

20.07.2016 (Annexure-34), order of punishment passed by the Disciplinary Authority contained in Memo No.2047 dated 15.09.2017 (Annexure-36), quashing the order contained in Memo No.1007 dated 11.05.2018 and also for consequential relief for reinstatement of petitioner in his service with all consequential benefits including full salary for the period of suspension.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are two charge memos followed by two enquiry reports have been issued against the petitioner and one another person, namely, Bishwanath Gupta. Against the second charge, Bishwanath Gupta has preferred writ petition before this Hon’ble Court and this Court in CWJC No.5974 of 2014 in which vide order dated 19.08.2014, the writ petition was allowed in his favour and in the light of the observation made the department has decided not to proceed