SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 2870

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1586 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7026 of 2018 ======================================================

1. The State of Bihar Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Joint Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

... ... Appellant/s Versus Ashok Kumar Son of Sri Sheo Ghahan Ram Resident of Mohalla- Dharhara, P.S.- Ara, District- Bhojpur.

... ... Respondent/s ======================================================

Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr.Mritunjay Kumar ( Ac To Aag 6)

For the Respondent/s : Mr.Prabhu Nath Pathak Mr. Lalit Kishore, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Kanishka Shankar, Adv.

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY

ORAL JUDGMENT

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)

Date : 03-04-2024 Re:- I.A. No. 03 of 2024 Heard I.A. No. 03 of 2024 for condonation of delay in filing LPA No. 1586 of 2019. Earlier I.A. No. 01 of 2019 for condonation was filed and there were certain defects in order to overcome that I.A. No. 03 of 2024 has been filed for condonation of delay of 109 days. Perusal of the reasoning, we are satisfied and that apart contesting respondent has not filed any objection to I.A. for condonation of delay. Accordingly, I.A. No. 03 of 2024 for condonation of delay in filing LPA for about 109 days stands condoned. I.A. No. 03 of 2024 is allowed. 2. The appellants-State have assailed the order of the learned Single Judge dated 18.07.2019 passed in CWJC No.7026 of 2018. Respondent-Executive Engineer was subjected to disciplinary proceedings on certain allegation insofar as execution of construction of bridge work. Inquiry Officer exonerated the respondent in the result Disciplinary Authority was required to invoke sub Rule 2 of Rule 18 of Bihar CCA Rules 2005. Perusal of annexure-7 notice, it is not crystal clear insofar as compliance to sub Rule 2 of Rule 18 of Bihar CCA Rules 2005. We find there is no infirmity in the impugned order dated 18.07.2019. In fact on technicalities impugned penalty order was set aside. There are no financial irregularities in the alleged charges so as to remand the matter to the disciplinary authority.

3. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that there are no financial loss cause to the State exchequer in view of certain alleged misdeeds stated to have been committed by the respondent and it was subject matter of this lis. Therefore, it is not a case warranted for remand in the light of Hon'ble Supreme Court decision in the case of Managing Director, ECIL V. B. Karunakar reported in (1993) 4 SCC 727 read with Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Coal India Limited & Ors. V. Ananta Saha and Others reported in (2011) 5 SCC 142. Accordingly, the appellants have not made out a case. Hence, LPA stands dismissed.

4. Pending I.A(s), if any, stands disposed of.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J)

( Alok Kumar Pandey, J)

vashudha/-

AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date Transmission Date NA

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top