SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 87

PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy
MD. ASIF @ MD ASHIQUE @ MD ASHIQUE ALAM @ ASHIQUE ALAM – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. MISC./73312/2022



An accused charged with robbery may be granted bail if the investigation has concluded, a charge-sheet has been submitted, and the accused has been in custody for a significant period of time.

Headnote:

BAIL - SECTION 439 CRPC - REGULAR BAIL - ACCUSED CHARGED WITH ROBBERY - INCRIMINATING ARTICLES RECOVERED - INVESTIGATION CONCLUDED - CHARGE-SHEET SUBMITTED - ACCUSED IN CUSTODY FOR MORE THAN 1 YEAR - BAIL GRANTED

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was arrested for allegedly robbing the informant and others while posing as police personnel. Incriminating articles were recovered from his possession. The investigation was concluded, and a charge-sheet was submitted.

Finding of the Court:

The court noted that the petitioner had been in custody for more than 1 year since his arrest on 21.8.2021 and that the investigation had concluded. Considering the nature of the allegations, the liberty granted to the petitioner in the earlier order of rejection dated 25.4.2022, and the fact that a charge-sheet had been submitted, the court directed the petitioner to be released on bail.

Issues: Whether the petitioner should be granted regular bail considering the nature of the allegations, the liberty granted in the earlier order of rejection, and the fact that the investigation had concluded and a charge-sheet had been submitted.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner was entitled to bail considering the nature of the allegations, the liberty granted in the earlier order of rejection, and the fact that the investigation had concluded and a charge-sheet had been submitted.

Final Decision: The court directed the petitioner to be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73312 of 2022

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-235 Year-2021 Thana- BAHADURGANJ District- Kishanganj

======================================================

MD. ASIF @ MD ASHIQUE @ MD ASHIQUE ALAM @ ASHIQUE

ALAM SON OF HALIMUDDIN R/O VILLAGE- TAPPU KALAGACHH,

MANGRA, P.S.- DIGHALBANK, DISTRICT- KISHANGANJ

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Amal Kumar Sinha, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY

ORAL ORDER

2

04-01-2023

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant

of regular bail in a case registered under sections 420, 419, 384,

385, 379 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, it is stated that the

accused persons posing themselves to be the police personnel

robbed the informant and others of their mobile phones etc. On

being followed by the informant and others they were soon

caught. While the petitioner was caught the other accused

persons managed to escape. Incriminating articles were

recovered from the petitioner’s possession.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

that the earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73312 of 2022(2) dt.04-01-2023

2/2

order dated 25.4.2022 (Annexure-1), giving liberty to the

petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after six months. The

petitioner is in custody since 21.8.2021, investigation in the

case has concluded and it has been more than eight months

since the order of the earlier rejection.

Heard learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

taking into consideration the nature of allegation, the liberty

granted to the petitioner in the earlier order of rejection dated

25.4.2022, the petitioner having remained in custody for more

than 1 year since 21.8.2021 and charge-sheet having been

submitted in the case, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on

bail in connection with Bahadurganj P.S. Case no. 235 of 2021

on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj.

avinash/-

(Partha Sarthy, J)

U

T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top