Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Sunil Dutta Mishra, J
Kauleshwar Pd. Singh – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Pamila Devi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. description of parties and ancestral property details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. details of written statements and contesting parties' claims. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. summation of evidence presented by both sides. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. court's findings on the issues raised in court. (Para 15 , 16 , 22) |
| 5. appellants argue previous partition and lack of unity. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. arguments regarding the lack of proof for separation. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 7. affirmation of the trial court's judgment. (Para 50 , 51 , 52) |
C.A.V. JUDGMENT
Date : 21-03-2025
This First Appeal has been filed by the appellants herein (defendant no.2 and his sons defendant nos.9 and 10 in the suit) against the preliminary decree dated 31.03.1987 passed by the learned Sub Judge VI, Patna in Title (Partition) Suit No.218 of 1974/46 of 1986 decreeing the suit on contest with cost against defendant nos.1 to 11 wherein a preliminary decree was passed for 1/3rd share of the plaintiffs and 1/3rd share of co-plaintiff nos.4 to 6 and also 1/3rd share of the defendant nos.1 to 11. It was further held that after preparation of preliminary decree, on separate petition of the p
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
