2023 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 7373
PRINCIPAL BENCH PATNA
M/s. Henraajh Feeds India Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CWJC 17576 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17576 of 2022
======================================================
M/s. Henraajh Feeds India Pvt. Ltd. Having registered office at G 62, Ground
Floor, P. C. Colony, Kankarbagh, Patna through its Managing Director
namely, Jaydeep Narayan Srivastava, aged about 49 Years, Male, Son of Late
Laxmi Narayan Srivastav, Resident of Neem Ghat, Water Tank Road, P.O.-
Jhauganj, P.S.- Khjekalan, Patna City, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Industry,
Vikas Bhavan, Bailey Road, Patna.
2.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Industry, Vikas Bhavan, Bailey
Road, Patna.
3.
The Director of Industries, Government of Bihar, Vikas Bhavan, Bailey
Road, Patna.
4.
The Director (Technical), Department of Industries, Bihar, Patna.
5.
The General Manager, District Industry Centre, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. S.D. Sanjay, Sr. Advocate.
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr. Kinkar Kumar, SC-9 with
Ms. Deepika Sharma, AC to SC-9
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 04-07-2023
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. This writ petition has been filed for seeking the
following reliefs:
(i) For quashing the order bearing Memo No.
350 dated 14.09.2022 issued by the Respondent
Director, Food Processing, Department of Industry,
Government of Bihar whereby the petitioner was
denied grant of capital subsidy as promised under
Integrated Development of Food Processing Sector
Scheme, 2008 read with the Industrial Incentive
Policy, 2011 without considering the fact that the
petitioner commenced its commercial production on
23.05.2016 and the project of the petitioner was
approved by S.I.P.B. and PAMC and therefore, the
same ought to had been granted to the petitioner;
Patna High Court CWJC No.17576 of 2022 dt.04-07-2023
2/8
(ii) For direction upon the Respondents for
grant of Capital Subsidy to the petitioner firm in terms
of Clause 2Vii (d) read with Integrated Development
of Food processing Sector Scheme, 2008 as promised
and committed by the Respondent State of Bihar
under the Industrial Incentive Policy, 2011 read with
Integrated Development of Food Sector Scheme,
2008;
(iii)For the declaration that the petitioner
firm is entitled for grant of Capital subsidy as
promised under Food Processing Policy, 2008 in
terms of Clause 2 (vii)(d) of the Industrial Incentive
Policy, 2011 as the said unit fulfills the eligibility
conditions as required under the Industrial Incentive
Policy, 2011 and for a further direction to the
Respondent State Government to disburse the amount
of subsidy in favour of the petitioner at the earliest as
promised by the Respondent;
(iv) For a declaration that in terms of the
procedure laid down in Memo No. 387 dated
26.05.2015 cannot be made applicable on projects
which has got S.I.P.B approval prior to the said Memo
and moreover even if is held to be applicable, it was
the duty and obligation of the Project Management
Committee to get the same approved from the
Minister, Department of Industry and the petitioner
cannot be denied the benefits for fault/latches on part
of the Respondents;
(v) For a direction upon the respondent to
grant all other incentives to which the petitioner firm
is entitled in terms of the promise and commitment
made by the Respondent State of Bihar under
Industrial Incentive Policy, 2011 as the petitioner firm
has established its unit in view of the benefits of in
terms of incentives promised by the respondent State;
Patna High Court CWJC No.17576 of 2022 dt.04-07-2023
3/8
(vi) For a direction to the respondents to
grant the incentives at the