SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 6855

PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar
ANAND KUMAR @ CHHUTHAWA – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. MISC./57933/2022



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57933 of 2022

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-2021 Thana- PARASBIGHA District- Jehanabad

======================================================

ANAND KUMAR @ CHHUTHAWA SON OF AKHILESH SHARMA R/O

VILLAGE- SAMANPURA, P.S.- NAUBATPUR, DISTT.- PATNA

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr.Samrendra Kumar Jha

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umanath Mishra

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR

ORAL ORDER

3

08-02-2023

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered

for the offence punishable under sections 399, 402, 412 of the

Indian Penal Code and sections 25(1b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms

Act.

As per allegation in the FIR, on getting secret

information about gathering of antisocial element, patrolling

party proceeded on place of occurrence. On seeing the police

personnel, accused persons started to escape but on chase five of

them including the petitioner were apprehended. It is further

alleged that one motorcycle, one loaded pistol, one live

cartridge and mobiles were recovered from the accused persons.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57933 of 2022(3) dt.08-02-2023

2/2

that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. The

recovered motorcycle is not a looted property rather it belongs

to father of co-accused Ujjual Kumar. Police took the signature

of the petitioner on blank paper to which later on it was

manufactured as seizure list by them. Petitioner is languishing in

judicial custody since 11.07.2021.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for

the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is

inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

Additional Sessions Judge-Xth, Jehanabad in connection with

Parasbigha P.S. Case No. 113 of 2021.

sushma/-

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

U

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top