SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 8357

PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar
BUDHAN RAM @ DUDHAN RAM @ HARI CHANDRA RAM – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. MISC./46529/2022



In cases of dowry death, bail may be granted if the allegations are general and omnibus, and there are no specific allegations against the accused.

Headnote:

BAIL - DOWRY DEATH - SECTION 302/201/34 IPC - BAIL GRANTED

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was arrested for allegedly subjecting his wife to torture and abuse due to non-fulfillment of dowry demands, leading to her death. The petitioner claimed that the allegations were false and that his wife had died due to abdominal pain.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the FIR contained general and omnibus allegations of murder against all the accused, without any specific allegations against the petitioner. The court also noted that the petitioner had been in judicial custody for over 10 months.

Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to bail in a case of dowry death.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner was entitled to bail considering the facts and circumstances of the case, including the lack of specific allegations against him and the length of time he had spent in custody.

Final Decision: The court granted bail to the petitioner on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 46529 of 2022

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2021 Thana- SURYAPURA District- Rohtas

======================================================

BUDHAN RAM @ DUDHAN RAM @ HARI CHANDRA RAM Son of

Ramnath Ram @ Ramnath Kahar Resident of Village - Milki (Suara), Police

Station- Suryapura, District - Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Rajani Kant Singh, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR

ORAL ORDER

3

11-01-2023

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for

the State and perused the case diary.

The petitioner is in custody in a case registered for the

offence punishable under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian

Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of subjecting torture to

the deceased and abused due to non-fulfilment of dowry demand.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner

has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that

earlier the deceased had no complaint of harass and torture rather she

was suffering from abdominal pain and on 22.01.2021 she was

referred to higher centre for proper medical treatment but in the way

she died accordingly the information was given to the informant. As

such, the entire prosecution case is false, concocted and contrary to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 46529 of 2022(3) dt.11-01-2023

2/2

the actual facts and no such occurrence took place as alleged by the

prosecution and from perusal of the FIR, it appears that there is

general and omnibus allegation of murder against all the accused

persons due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry and no specific

allegation against this petitioner. Marriage of the deceased and the

petitioner had taken place in the year 2010 and from the said wedlock

two children born. Petitioner is in judicial custody since 02.03.2022.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the

prayer for regular bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner

is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each

to the satisfaction of Sri L.B. Paswan, Judicial Magistrate, Ist,

Bikramganj, District- Rohtas/concerned Court in connection with

Suryapura P.S. Case No. 15 of 2021.

Brajesh Kumar/-

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

U

T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top