PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha
Byash Prasad Singh – Appellant
Versus
The Union Of India and Ors – Respondent
CWJC/670/2018
LAND ACQUISITION - COMPENSATION - ENHANCEMENT - ARBITRATION - SECTION 3-G(5) OF THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS ACT, 1956
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner's land was acquired by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) for the construction of a national highway. The petitioner was dissatisfied with the compensation amount offered by the NHAI and filed a petition before the District Land Acquisition Officer for enhancement of compensation.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the petitioner's claim for enhancement of compensation should be filed before the Arbitrator appointed by the Central Government under Section 3-G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956.
Issues: Whether the petitioner's claim for enhancement of compensation should be filed before the District Land Acquisition Officer or the Arbitrator appointed by the Central Government under Section 3-G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 3-G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956 provides that if the amount of compensation determined by the competent authority is not acceptable to either party, the amount shall be determined by the Arbitrator appointed by the Central Government.
Final Decision: The court directed the petitioner to file his claim for enhancement of compensation before the Arbitrator within four weeks from the date of the order. The Arbitrator was directed to decide the claim within four months from the date of receipt of the claim.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.670 of 2018
======================================================
Byash Prasad Singh Son of Late Ygyanand Singh, resident of Village Dulma,
P.W. Circle- Madhuban, District- East Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Union Of India
2.
The Secretary Govt. of India Ministry of Road Transport of Highway, New
Delhi.
3.
National Highway Authority of India through its Project Director, Incharge
of N.H. 104, New Delhi.
4.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Revenue and Land
Reforms, Government of Bihar,
5.
The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar,
Patna.
6.
The District Magistrate cum Collector, East Champaran at Motihari.
7.
The Sub Divisional Officer, Pakari Dayal, East Champaran.
8.
The District Land Acquisition Officer, East Champaran at Motihari.
9.
The Circle Officer, Madhuban, East Champaran.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr.Raj Kishore Roy -Gp18
Mr. Navnit Kumar, AC to GP 18
For NHAI
:
Mr, S. N. Pathak
Mr. Saurav Nikunj
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
ORAL ORDER
11
10-01-2023
The contention of the petitioner is that his land
bearing Khata No. 302, Plot No. 433, Mouja- Dulma, Thana No.
- 02, area 11 decimals, has been acquired by the National
Highways Authority of India (for short the “N.H.A.I.”) but
adequate compensation has not been granted to the petitioner
inasmuch instead of giving compensation at commercial rate,
the petitioner has been given compensation only treating his
Patna High Court CWJC No.670 of 2018(11) dt.10-01-2023
2/3
land as a residential land.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
compensation of the subject land acquired by the N.H.A.I. is not
adequate and for enhancement of the same the petitioner has
filed petition before the District Land Acquisition Officer, East
Champaran, at Motihari.
On the other hand, Mr. S.N. Pathak, learned counsel
appearing for the N.H.A.I. submits that as per Section 3-G(5) of
the National Highways Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the
“N.H. Act”) “if the amount determined by the competent
authority under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) is not
acceptable to either of the parties, the amount shall, on an
application by either of the parties, be determined by the
Arbitrator to be appointed by Central Government”. He next
submits that now the Central Government has notified
Divisional Commissioner of the area as Arbitrator under the
N.H. Act.
In view of the aforesaid, the petitioner is directed to
file his claim for enhancement of compensation amount as per
Section 3-G(5) of the N.H. Act before the Arbitrator i.e.
Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut, within a period of four weeks
from today.
Patna High Court CWJC No.670 of 2018(11) dt.10-01-2023
3/3
If such a claim is filed within the aforesaid time, the
learned Arbitrator shall decide the same in accordance with law
after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned and will
pass a reasoned order within a reasonable time period,
preferably within a period of four months from the date of
receipt/production of a copy of this order.
With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ
application is disposed of.
Prabhakar Anand/-
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.)
U
√
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.