SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3282

PATNA HIGH COURT
Md. Wasimuddin – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)

Date : 26-06-2024 None appears for the petitioner.

2. The present M.J.C. is filed for modification of order dated 17.03.2015 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 3394 of 2014. For the purpose of modification of the aforementioned order, in para-2, it is stated as under:

“2. That on page 2 at 7th line from bottan “with liberty to the respondents to proceed in accordance with law” it is stated that order dated 05.05.2009 is annexure-8 at Page 56, it is evident that respondent BIADA urged before the Court that the respondent retain the liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law, if they so desire. The Court observed “what the authority may do or may not do Subsequently is for the authority to decide. and Not for this Court todwell upon or observe at this stage”.

3. The aforementioned reasons for modification amounts to review of the order dated 17.03.2015 in the guise of modification of the order. The modification of any order is permissible only if there are any typographical error. If the modification is sought for reviewing the order, in that event, M.J.C. for modification is not maintainable.

4. Accordingly, the present M.J.C. stands d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top