PATNA HIGH COURT
Ramesh Bari @ Ramesh Kumar Bari – Appellant
Versus
Dinesh Yadav – Respondent
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 18-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondents 1st set and I intend to dispose of the petition at the stage of admission itself.
02. The present petition has been filed under Article
227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 16.02.2023 passed by learned Munsif Ist, Madhubani in Title Suit No. 13 of 2016 whereby and whereunder some of the amendments sought by the plaintiffs for amending the plaint, have been rejected. Further prayer has been made for allowing all the proposed amendments which have been sought by the plaintiff.
03. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is plaintiff no. 3 and other plaintiffs have been made party as respondent 2nd party. The plaintiffs filed a Title Suit No. 13 of 2016 in the Court of learned Civil Judge,-1 Madhubani against the defendants for declaration and confirmation of possession with respect to Schedule-II land and also for recovery of possession if dispossessed during pendency of suit apart from other ancillary reliefs. After notice the defendants/respondents 1st party appeared and filed their written statement. Thereafter, the p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.